Are you impacted by the Emerald Flood Levee Banks?

Multiple flood events have caused considerable trouble and heartache for Emerald businesses and residents.  To better protect the city and minimise flood impacts, Central Highlands Regional Council have developed the Emerald Flood Protection Scheme ("EFPS").  The EFPS consists of several separate levee banks and was considered to be the most economic option for flood mitigation.

As with any development though, Council will need land for the levees to be constructed on and home owners may face the uncertainty of if the levee will go ahead and if their property will be ones of those Council needs.  In an already volatile property market, this has already caused effects on market value and saleability of homes in the area and left a few home owners in an uncertain position.  This uncertainty for home owners has led to Council releasing the Emerald Flood Protection Scheme Acquisition Policy.  This policy allows for a team of Council representatives to negotiate directly with home owners on a one-on-one basis for a voluntary option to acquire their property in the future. 

Any acquisition option negotiated will not proceed unless, and until, the final decision to proceed with the levies has been made.   The Acquisition Policy negotiations will be open to landowners for a period from 31 August, 2015, to 30 November, 2015 and Council has agreed to meet any reasonable legal and valuation costs incurred by the property owner negotiating an acquisition option with Council.

Directly affected landowners are not required to participate in these Acquisition Policy negotiations and if the levee proposal goes ahead, resumption action may be taken by Council for those properties not already covered by a voluntary acquisition option.

CHANGES TO BIOSECURITY AND QUARANTINE – ARE YOU READY?

The new Biosecurity Act 2014 has been recently passed by Parliament and will replace the Quarantine Act 1908 in mid 2016.  The old Quarantine Act was originally designed to protect us from outbreaks of small pox and the bubonic plague. The old Act had been amended on numerous occasions, but the new risks that we face are very different these days and so the new Act is designed for more effective management of modern risks.

Queenslanders will need to report unusual events that might be related to biosecurity, for example, abnormally high mortality or morbidity rates in animals and sudden unexplained falls in production.  They will also have obligations for registering some animals and reporting their movements to allow for disease tracing.  The new Act will improve Queensland's biosecurity preparedness and response capabilities to assist rural property owners. 

 

If you have any questions, please contact Jade Hayman from the Rural Mining & Gas Team at Rees R & Sydney Jones Solicitors.

Landowner rights restored by the State, but now the Federal Government may have go!

Late last year the State Government passed the MERCP Bill which took away the rights of various community groups, landowners and persons concerned. To put it simply the bill made it hard or impossible for anyone other than a directly affected landowner to object to an Application for a Mining Lease or an Environmental Authority. The bill was passed but never came into effect.  Last month a Bill revoked s47D of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 which restored objection rights to coordinated projects.

 The Federal Government now is making noises that they want to remove the legal right for persons other than those directly affected to object to approvals.  This would cause the same problems and reaction that the removal of the rights at a state level caused.  A landowner should be able to object to a coal mine if they are not directly affected by the Mining Lease but their Water Source is going to be impaired. A landowner should be able to object to a project if the dust impacts outside of the mining lease are going to cause health issues.

 Hopefully the Federal Government reviews the consultations that took place when the Queensland government considers this issue. Landowners would be well advised to speak to their members and federal representatives about their concerns on this issue.

Melanie Oliver the Rural, Mining & Gas Partner at local law firm Rees R & Sydney Jones.  If you have any questions, please contact Melanie on 4927 6333.

Changes to Restricted Land Laws may diminsh Landowner Rights

 On 5 June 2014 the Mineral and Energy Resources (Common Provisions) Bill 2014 was presented to Parliament.  If the Bill becomes law then there will be a variety of amendments to the current laws, which will diminish the rights of Landowners when they are negotiating or dealing with a mining company.

What are the current rights of Landholders in regard to Restricted Land?

At the moment, a Mining Lease can be granted over Land that is "Restricted Land" only if the owner of the land gives consent to the application for the Mining Lease. "Restricted Land" means land that is within 100m of permanent buildings used for accommodation or business, community or recreational buildings. It also means land within 50m of a bore, dam, some water storage facilities, cemeteries or burial places or a principal stockyard.

 Currently, what happens if the Landowner won't give consent?

If a Landowner won't give consent, then the application cannot be granted over the "Restricted Land" areas. A Landowner with a property that had Restricted Land was therefore put in better bargaining position with a Mining Company.

 Are there changes in how Restricted Land is treated if the Bill becomes law?

Yes. The Bill proposes changes in the types of infrastructure used to identify Restricted Land. Only land within a "prescribed distance" of certain types of buildings or infrastructure will be considered as Restricted Land.  At this stage, we do not know whether that "prescribed distance" is going to be the same as under the current law, because the "prescribed distance" is yet to be written into the regulations. The regulations have not been issued yet.

If the Bill becomes new law and I have say a bore, will things change for me if a Mining Lease is applied for?

Yes. The types of infrastructure or buildings that are now considered to be "Restricted Land" are changing.  In the new Bill, Restricted Land will mean land within the prescribed distance of a residence, a place of worship, a childcare centre, hospital or library. It will also include a school, a cemetery or burial place. An area within a prescribed distance of intensive animal feedlotting, pig keeping, poultry farming and aquaculture will become a restricted area. In other words, pretty much only buildings are now protected, and definitely not watering facilities.

 So, under the current system if a Mining Lease was to be applied for over an area where you had a dam or bore, you could withhold your consent and the mining lease would not have been granted over that area. If the bill becomes law, you will not be able to prevent the grant of a mining lease over the area around your dam or bore by withholding consent.

 For further information in relation to these issues, contact Justin Houlihan or Melanie Oliver at Rees R & Sydney Jones on 4927 6333.

Watch out you do not Opt Out?

 The new Mining and Energy Resources (Common Provisions) Bill 2014 was passed by the LNP Government and comes into force over the next month or so.  Whilst there has been much debate over the issue of removing rights to object to Mining Leases for landowners, some other nasty provisions have been added to the mix which landholders need to be wary of.  Rural Lawyer Melanie Oliver explains the new “Opt Out Agreements” that have just been added into the already confusing world of resource company documents.

An owner or an occupier of Land can now Opt Out of a Conduct and Compensation Agreement with a resource company. Once an Opt Out Agreement is signed, the resource company can enter the land and start its activities.  In our view it would be very rare for it ever to be appropriate for a Landholder to sign an Opt Out Agreement and we would urge Landholders to be very cautious and get full advice before signing anything they are presented.

If you would like further information or have any questions please give Melanie Oliver, Amy Gudmann or Justin Houlihan a call at Rees R & Sydney Jones on (07) 4927 6333.  

Compulsory Acquisition for Roads

A number of proposals have been flagged by Local Governments and other parties for the resumption of lands for the construction of new or upgraded roads in the Capricorn Region.

Under the Acquisition of Land Act, land may be taken by a constructing authority which may be the State of Queensland or a Local Government. There are limits on the purposes for which a Local Government may resume land but it must generally be for a public purpose. Land can be taken either by full acquisition, or by the constructing authority merely taking an easement over the land. Whether the land is fully acquired or by easement will depend upon the nature of the activities to be undertaken. Where land is taken or acquired for purposes of constructing a road, the land would be fully acquired as it is not appropriate to take an easement in those circumstances.

The first step in the acquisition process is the issuing of a Notice of Intention to Resume by the constructing authority. The notice must be served on every person who could make a claim for compensation, such as an owner of the land, as well as any mortgagee of the land. Once you have received a Notice of Intention to Resume you are entitled to lodge an objection to the taking of the land and subsequently attend a conference with representatives of the constructing authority to speak in support of the grounds of your objection. You may be represented by a solicitor or agent at that hearing.

If the constructing authority determines the land is still required to be taken for the original purpose for which it was proposed, then it may apply to the Minister for the land to be taken. If the Minister is satisfied that the land should be taken, then notice is published in the Government Gazette and you cease to be the owner of the resumed land.  Your right in relation to the land is then simply converted into a right to claim compensation pursuant to the Acquisition of Land Act.

Compensation can be agreed between the parties.  In the absence of agreement, compensation is determined by the Land Court.

Justin Houlihan is a Partner at local law firm Rees R & Sydney Jones.

ACCESS LAND – WATCH YOUR SPOKEN WORDS WHEN DEALING WITH RESOURCE COMPANIES!

It is a longstanding general rule in property law which says that if you are going to give away a right or interest in your Land, then this should be in writing. Unfortunately though, as new laws have been created to deal with Land Access for coal seam gas (CSG) and mining companies, this general and longstanding rule has been whittled away.

What is an Access Agreement?

Sometimes gas companies need access across blocks of land to get to the blocks of land under which the coal seam gas (CSG) might be found. The gas companies are required under the Petroleum and Gas legislation to enter into "Access Agreements" with landowners and occupiers of land. The right to come across the land is called an "Access Right" and it can include the right to construct roads or tracks across your Land to allow them to get to the area that they want to explore.

How can I give away access rights without an agreement in writing?

The Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act is currently drafted in such a way that Access Agreements or Access Rights can be given away orally.

How are Access Agreements different to Conduct and Compensation Agreements?

These Access Agreements are very different. There isn't even a need to compensate the Landowners or occupiers under an Access Agreements. Conduct and Compensation Agreements have to be in writing. If an oral agreement is made in regard to an Access Arrangement for say a road across the land, then this could be enough to allow a company to access and build the road on your Land. There is no requirement for compensation to be paid, but it can be negotiated.

If a Seller of Land enters into an oral agreement, and I buy the place, am I bound by this?

Yes. The law states that these agreements are binding on future owners of the Land. The fact that someone's word could bind up a property well into the future is obviously a very large problem and the law should be changed.

Surely the new laws about mining and gas will fix this won't they?

No. The laws in regard to Access Land are changing; however when the Mining and Energy Resources (Common Provisions) Bill 2014 was presented to Parliament on 5 June 2014, the problem with oral Access Agreements had not been addressed. It seems silly that a company might be allowed to build a large road on someone’s land without giving someone compensation, and without entering into a written agreement.

Every situation is different and because some things you even say now could be binding on you, you really should seek legal advice as soon as you are approached by a mining or gas company for access to your Land. It is also very important to look at whether or not your land is inside or outside the exploration area or tenement of a company to know what type of agreement you should be negotiating.

If you would like further information or have any questions please give Melanie Oliver, Amy Gudmann or Justin Houlihan a call on (07) 4927 6333.